Mike Strobel wrote an opinion piece over on Canoe.ca in which he states:
Which leaves us with the thorny question of women serving in armies that are hellbent on slaughtering each other.
To me the answer is simple: Do not send women into combat.
He then proceeds to tell us just how much harder it is to see the pictures of the faces of the women who have died in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It would be terrible if those faces were of young men.
I'm sorry, but it is even worse that they are of young women.
Either he cares less that young men are dying, or he is a sexist who believes women need to be coddled and protected. I don't buy into that old fashioned thinking.
Why our gut reaction to those photos of Capt. Goddard and her American comrades-in-arms?
This has naught to do with equal pay or equal rights or equal access or equal anything.
It has to do with the female of our species being kinder, gentler. The nurturer. Mom, for crying out loud.
So in his little world, if women are not allowed to be soliders, does that mean men are not allowed to be nuturers? Of course we know that is absurd. In out enlightened times we recognize that not every man is a deadly solider and not every woman is a nuturing mother. Just as we would allow a man to raise a child, we should have no compunctions about a woman raising a gun if she so chooses.
And if people like Mike Strobel have a problem with it, maybe they should talk to the female soldiers before demanding they are removed from duty first.
(Also, I object to him lumping me and the rest of Canada in with his opinion. I assure you no extra-large lump formed in my throat when I heard it was a woman who was killed as opposed to a man. All death in war is a tragedy and making a bigger deal out of one of them regardless of the reason trivializes the rest.)